🔗 Share this article

A Eritrean asylum seeker has successfully obtained a last-minute court injunction temporarily stopping his removal to France as part of the new migrant exchange agreement.

This young man, who reached in the United Kingdom by means of a migrant vessel on 12 August, had been due to be sent back midweek in accordance with the deportation pilot program finalized in July by the both nations.

In the first legal challenge opposing the agreement, considered at the London judiciary, his legal team claimed that he needed further opportunity to present evidence suggesting he may have been a target of modern slavery – and that the determination to remove him had been hurried.

Lawyers for the Home Office countered that he could have sought protection in the French territory and presented lacking justification as to why it was an unsafe acceptable nation for him.

They additionally warned that delaying his departure could prompt fellow migrants allocated to comparable deportation journeys to come forward with similar arguments, thereby weakening the public interest of preventing lethal illegal voyages.

Yet during the proceedings, it came to light that while the government’s own caseworkers had rejected his trafficking assertion, they had additionally indicated in a recent document that he was entitled to the option to provide further evidence – and that they would not anticipate him to submit materials while in French soil.

The development prompted Mr Justice Sheldon to approve a interim injunction on the claimant’s return, even though dismissing his argument that he would be made without shelter in France.

"It constitutes a significant issue to be examined in regard to the trafficking allegation and if the Home Office has carried out her investigatory obligations in a proper way," he stated.

The judge also observed that if there was a reasonable indication that the man had been exploited – a situation that might not exclusively occur in France – it would represent a formal bar to removal for at least a limited timeframe.

This court order poses serious concerns about whether further individuals scheduled for return journeys may use comparable legal avenues to challenge or halt their departure from the United Kingdom – or whether they are being subjected to hurried assessments.

This claimant, who is not permitted to be identified for legal purposes, as per court filings departed Ethiopia two years ago and reached the Italian Republic in recently.

Shortly following that, he relocated to French soil, where he was assisted by aid groups including the relief agencies, until his mother according to claims paid $1,400 (approximately £1,024) to illegal operators for his small boat passage to the UK.

During the legal proceedings, it was revealed that he informed interviewers during his screening assessment that he had never been abused and had been paid when he labored as a laborer in North Africa.

When inquired why he had did not request asylum prior to coming the United Kingdom, the individual stated that he had seen people residing on the outdoors in Europe and had formed the view that there was no welfare available.

Official representatives contended that he ought to have sought protection in France as he was no longer under the influence of smuggling groups.

But, defense counsel, arguing on his behalf, claimed that the government had still not adequately assessed whether her client was a victim of modern slavery – and that there had been no assessment of whether deporting him to the French nation would render him without means.

Concerning the Migrant Exchange Deal

This 'one in, one out' program was introduced in recently by Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the French administration.

Pursuant to the treaty, the French government committed to take back asylum seekers who had crossed to the UK by illegal means and had their refugee applications declared inadmissible.

For exchange, the British authorities would receive someone with a qualifying claim for protection who had never tried to cross the Channel.

So far, no-one has been deported through the program. The pioneering repatriations to France had been expected to begin this week.

During the last two weeks, a number of migrants being held in government holding sites were issued letters indicating that they would be put on a scheduled flight leaving from London Heathrow for Paris at early on Wednesday.

Yet, several contacts indicated that a number of of the scheduled individuals had been informed that their departure would be postponed as more submissions concerning their situations were processed.

Upon being pressured by journalists – ahead of the legal ruling – if the initiative was a "disarray", a official spokesperson replied "absolutely not".

They further stated that the administration was "assured" in the lawful basis for the pilot scheme, and that they had "taken measures to guarantee it's in line with UK and international law; similar to any policy, we're ready to react